Comparing .NET Aspire, AWS Copilot, and Dapr: A .NET Developer's Perspective
As someone who's been writing C# since the days of .NET Framework 2.0, I've seen the ecosystem evolve dramatically. When microservices became the hot new thing, we .NET developers had to piece together various tools and patterns. Now, we're seeing a new wave of tools trying to simplify distributed applications, with .NET Aspire leading the charge from Microsoft.
In this post, I'll compare .NET Aspire with AWS Copilot and Dapr, focusing on how they handle common distributed application challenges. I'll share code examples and honest thoughts about where each tool shines and falls short.
The Players
.NET Aspire
Microsoft's new end-to-end solution for cloud-native applications. It's tightly integrated with .NET 8 and aims to provide a seamless developer experience from local development to production.
AWS Copilot
AWS's take on simplifying container applications. It's language-agnostic but particularly well-suited for containerized .NET applications deployed to AWS.
Dapr
A portable, event-driven runtime that makes building distributed applications easier. It's completely language and platform agnostic.
Service Discovery Face-off
Let's look at how each handles service discovery with a simple example: an order service calling a payment service.
.NET Aspire
csharp// In Program.cs of OrderService var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args); // Register PaymentService client builder.AddHttpClient<IPaymentService, PaymentServiceClient>("payment-service"); // In PaymentServiceClient.cs public class PaymentServiceClient : IPaymentService { private readonly HttpClient _httpClient; public PaymentServiceClient(HttpClient httpClient) { _httpClient = httpClient; } public async Task ProcessPayment(Order order) { await _httpClient.PostAsJsonAsync("/api/payments", order); } }
Aspire handles service discovery through environment variables in development and integrates with your production platform's service discovery (like Kubernetes) in production. The magic happens in the AppHost project:
csharpvar builder = DistributedApplication.CreateBuilder(args); var payment = builder.AddProject<Projects.PaymentService>("payment-service"); var order = builder.AddProject<Projects.OrderService>("order-service") .WithReference(payment);
AWS Copilot
yaml# In copilot/order-service/manifest.yml name: order-service type: Load Balanced Web Service variables: PAYMENT_SERVICE_URL: http://payment-service.local services: dependencies: payment-service: true
csharp// In Program.cs var paymentServiceUrl = Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("PAYMENT_SERVICE_URL"); builder.Services.AddHttpClient<IPaymentService, PaymentServiceClient>(client => { client.BaseAddress = new Uri(paymentServiceUrl); });
Dapr
yaml# In components/service-invocation.yaml apiVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1 kind: Component metadata: name: service-invocation spec: type: bindings.http version: v1
csharp// Using Dapr SDK builder.Services.AddDaprClient(); // In PaymentServiceClient.cs public class PaymentServiceClient : IPaymentService { private readonly DaprClient _daprClient; public PaymentServiceClient(DaprClient daprClient) { _daprClient = daprClient; } public async Task ProcessPayment(Order order) { await _daprClient.InvokeMethodAsync<Order>( "payment-service", "api/payments", order); } }
Telemetry & Observability
.NET Aspire
Aspire shines with its out-of-the-box integration with OpenTelemetry:
csharpvar builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args); // One line to add telemetry! builder.AddServiceDefaults();
This automatically sets up distributed tracing, metrics, and logging with smart defaults.
AWS Copilot
Copilot integrates with AWS X-Ray and CloudWatch:
yaml# In copilot/order-service/manifest.yml observability: tracing: true # Enables X-Ray
csharp// Program.cs builder.Services.AddAWSXRay(); // Need to add AWS SDK
Dapr
Dapr provides observability through its sidecar:
yamlapiVersion: dapr.io/v1alpha1 kind: Configuration metadata: name: appconfig spec: tracing: samplingRate: "1" zipkin: endpointAddress: "http://zipkin:9411/api/v2/spans"
Where Each Tool Shines
Choose .NET Aspire if:
- You're all-in on .NET and want the most integrated experience
- You value developer experience and productivity
- You want minimal configuration for common patterns
- You're comfortable with Microsoft's opinions on architecture
Choose AWS Copilot if:
- You're committed to AWS
- You want a simple path to production on AWS
- You need built-in AWS service integration
- You want something language-agnostic but AWS-specific
Choose Dapr if:
- You need to support multiple languages/platforms
- You want maximum flexibility in your infrastructure
- You need advanced patterns like pub/sub, state management
- You want to avoid vendor lock-in
My Personal Take
As a .NET developer, I'm genuinely excited about Aspire. It feels like the tool we've been waiting for - it just makes things work. The integration with .NET tooling is seamless, and the developer experience is outstanding.
However, I have some reservations:
- It's very new (preview at time of writing)
- It's somewhat opinionated about architecture
- Production deployment story is still evolving
Copilot is fantastic if you're on AWS, but it feels more like an infrastructure tool than a developer tool. It solves real problems but doesn't provide the same level of developer experience as Aspire.
Dapr is the most mature and flexible option. It's battle-tested and provides more features out of the box. However, it comes with more complexity and requires more setup than Aspire.
Conclusion
There's no one-size-fits-all answer. .NET Aspire is the most appealing for .NET-focused teams, especially those starting new projects. Copilot is perfect for teams already invested in AWS. Dapr remains the swiss army knife of distributed applications, especially in polyglot environments.
My prediction? We'll see teams using combinations of these tools - perhaps Aspire for local development with Dapr components in production, or Aspire with Copilot for AWS deployments. The future of .NET distributed applications is looking bright!
What's your experience with these tools? I'd love to hear your thoughts in the comments below!